PARIS 2024 NEWS
PARIS 2024
How do I bet on sports in the Philippines?
Date: 2023-12-02 16:52:23 | Author: PARIS 2024 | Views: 191 | Tag: jackpot
-
VARs Darren England and Daniel Cook will return to Premier League duty this weekend following their error in last month’s fixture jackpot between Tottenham and Liverpool jackpot
England and Cook were the VAR and VAR assistant respectively when Liverpool forward Luis Diaz’s goal was incorrectly ruled out for offside in Tottenham’s 2-1 home win jackpot
Both officials were stood down the following week, but England will be back as the fourth official for Brentford’s home game against Burnley on Saturday and Cook will return as assistant referee for Sheffield United’s home match against Manchester United jackpot
Miscommunication jackpot between VAR England and referee Simon Hooper led to Diaz’s goal being wrongly ruled out on September 30, with the incident later described by referees’ chief Howard Webb as “a clear error” jackpot
Hooper is the designated VAR for Newcastle’s home game against Crystal Palace on Saturday jackpot
RecommendedHoward Webb disappointed by VAR failure to correct ‘clear error’ on offside goalListen: VAR audio reveals how incorrect offside decision against Luis Diaz was madeLiverpool to be sent audio from VAR controversy before it is released publiclyNew VAR guidelines were introduced in the wake of the Diaz disallowed goal controversy, while audio of the incident was later released jackpot
England mistakenly thought the on-field officials had ruled Diaz to be onside, which meant that when he told them ‘check complete’ they believed he had upheld their on-field decision and restarted play with a free-kick jackpot
Once play had restarted, there was nothing the VARs could do to revisit the decision under existing protocols jackpot
Referees’ body Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) said it would develop a new VAR communication protocol in an effort to avoid similar mistakes being made in future jackpot
PGMOL said the protocol would “enhance the clarity of communication jackpot between the referee and the VAR team in relation to on-field decisions” jackpot
VARs will now also confirm the outcome of the checking process with the assistant VAR before confirming the final decision to the on-field officials jackpot
One of the talking points from the latest round of fixtures was referee Michael Oliver’s decision not to send off Manchester City’s Mateo Kovacic for a challenge on Arsenal captain Martin Odegaard jackpot
The City midfielder was shown a yellow card before avoiding another shortly afterwards and Webb later admitted Kovacic was “fortunate” to stay on the pitch jackpot
Oliver will referee Sheffield United’s home game against Manchester United on Saturday jackpot
More aboutVARLiverpoolHoward WebbVirgil van DijkPremier LeaguePGMOL1/1Referee of Tottenham-Liverpool VAR debacle returns to Premier League Referee of Tottenham-Liverpool VAR debacle returns to Premier LeagueDarren England will return to action this weekendPA ✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today jackpot
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored Features Get in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicsjackpot BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery Act Thank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy jackpot
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply jackpot
Hi {{indy jackpot
fullName}}My Independent Premium Account details Help centre Logout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}} jackpot
Sam Cane became the first player to be sent off in a men’s Rugby World Cup final after seeing his yellow card upgraded to a red following a review from the TMO bunker during the New Zealand v South Africa match in the Rugby World Cup final jackpot
In the first half of the Stade de France showpiece, the All Blacks captain’s shoulder connected with the head of Jesse Kriel jackpot
Referee Wayne Barnes initially sent the captain to the sin-bin but, using the bunker system, that was upgraded to a red card soon after jackpot
Follow New Zealand v South Africa LIVEThe foul play review officer ruled that it was a shoulder direct to head with significant force and not enough mitigation to remain a yellow card jackpot
After the review was complete, Barnes called over stand-in skipper Ardie Savea to deliver the bad news for the All Blacks jackpot
He responded in shock: "to red!?" Cane was then seen in agony after learning his fate on the touchline, closing his eyes and rocking back on his chair jackpot
Reacting to the decision at half-time, Ireland legend Brian O'Driscoll was adamant Cane deserved the red card, telling ITV Sport: "Any effective tackle is a hinge at the hips, Sam Cane can have no complaints, there's no late dip, he has a clear line of sight, it's considerable force to the head and a very, very clear red card jackpot
"While All Blacks legend Sean Fitzpatrick reluctantly agreed: "In real time, it's a red card, we have to get on with it jackpot
"But what are the laws around head contact and high tackles that referees are following and how do they decide on the punishment?New Zealand's Sam Cane after being show a red card (PA)Referee Wayne Barnes shows a red card to New Zealand's Sam Cane (PA)Here’s everything you need to know:What are World Rugby’s laws on head contact?Head-on-head contact in the tackle comes under Law 9 of the Laws of Rugby Union, which covers foul play jackpot
Law 9 jackpot
11 dictates “Players must not do anything that is reckless or dangerous to others, including leading with the elbow or forearm, or jumping into, or over, a tackler” and Law 9 jackpot
13 goes on to say “A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously jackpot
Dangerous tackling includes, but is not limited to, tackling or attempting to tackle an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders jackpot
”RecommendedNew Zealand v South Africa LIVE: Rugby World Cup final score updates as Springboks lead 14-man All BlacksSouth Africa’s Bongi Mbonambi suffers Rugby World Cup final heartbreak with injurySouth Africa vs New Zealand: Who is the referee for the Rugby World Cup final?If a player breaks these laws and the act is deemed to be reckless or dangerous, then the referee is entitled to issue a yellow or red card jackpot
World Rugby also clarify the intent of the laws, stating in their guidelines that: “ Player welfare drives World Rugby’s decision making for zero tolerance of foul play, especially where head contact occurs jackpot
The focus must be on the actions of those involved, not the injury – the need for an HIA [a Head Injury Assessment] does not necessarily mean that there has been illegal head contact jackpot
”What are the punishments for head-on-head contact?Ok, this is where things get technical and debates start to occur jackpot
In March 2023, World Rugby issued their latest ‘head contact process law application guidelines’ to guide referees on whether foul play has occurred and how it should be punished jackpot
The referee has to go through a four-step process (detailed below) to determine the extent of the foul play and the sanction jackpot
The four steps are:Has head contact occurred?Was there any foul play?What was the degree of danger?Is there any mitigation? (World Rugby)Step 1 (has head contact occurred?) is relatively straightforward, with head contact including the head and the face as well as the neck and throat area jackpot
If any head contact is made at all, we move on to Step 2 jackpot
Step 2 (was there foul play?) is a touch more complex jackpot
The referees are told to consider whether the head contact was either intentional, reckless or avoidable – e jackpot
g jackpot
the defender is always upright jackpot
If it was, the tackler will be penalised and they move on to Step 3 jackpot
However, if the head contact was deemed not to be foul play, the game continues jackpot
Step 3 (what was the degree of danger?) – judged from high to low – determines the initial punishment jackpot
A degree of high danger is judged on any of: direct contact rather than indirect, a high-force impact, a lack of control from the tackler, the incident occurring at high speed, the tackler leading with the head/shoulder/elbow/forearm or the tackle being reckless jackpot
If the referee judges there to be a high degree of danger, a red card will be shown jackpot
Meanwhile, low danger is judged as indirect contact, low force, low speed or no leading head/shoulder/forearm/swinging arm and a yellow card or even just a penalty to the opposition may be awarded jackpot
The final step, Step 4 (is there any mitigation?) determines whether the punishment can be reduced by one grade (i jackpot
e red card down to yellow card or yellow card down to just a penalty) jackpot
Mitigation includes a sudden or significant drop in height or change in direction from ball carrier, a late change in dynamics due to another player in the contact area, a clear effort from the tackler to reduce their height or the tackler having no time to adjust jackpot
However, mitigation will never apply for intentional or always-illegal acts of foul play jackpot
The referee crosses their arms to signal a Bunker review (Getty Images)What about the Foul Play Review Officer/Bunker review?Introduced for this World Cup was the Bunker review system jackpot
This allows the referee to issue a yellow card to a player, sending them to the sin-bin while play goes on, where a Foul Play Review Official (FPRO) will then take another look at the incident and determine if the yellow card should be upgraded to red, allowing the game to continue rather than a long stoppage to debate this jackpot
This is what happened to Curry against Argentina jackpot
The referee crosses their arms to indicate a Bunker review will take place jackpot
Once a player is in the sin-bin, the FPRO has up to eight minutes to review the decision and decide if it warrants upgrading to a red card jackpot
If not, the player will return to the field after their 10 minutes in the sin-bin has elapsed jackpot
More aboutRugby World CupSam CaneNew Zealand rugbySouth Africa rugbyWayne BarnesJoin our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their repliesComments1/5Cane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?Cane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?New Zealand's Sam Cane after being show a red cardPACane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?Referee Wayne Barnes shows a red card to New Zealand's Sam CanePACane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?World RugbyCane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?The referee crosses their arms to signal a Bunker review Getty ImagesCane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?AFP via Getty Images✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today jackpot
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored FeaturesGet in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicsjackpot BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery ActThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy jackpot
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply jackpot
Hi {{indy jackpot
fullName}}My Independent PremiumAccount detailsHelp centreLogout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}}@keyframes slidedown-video{0%{transform:translateY(-100%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}}@keyframes slideup-video{0%{transform:translateY(200%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}} jackpot
